There were some mistakes in Drishyam2. The girl gets epilepsy during questioning and falls down. But her head is not injured. The case is taken to court even before the DNA results arrive.
true... also what happ to the eye witness..did he rejoin with his family? why create a storyline for him? Also how sure was Mohanlal that the write will surely come to the station and talk about the novel? Even the audio recordings are solid proof..but according to IG..that is not working. Also.. I felt in the end, Mohanlal's handwriting could also be used against him as proof.. Though movie was good,part 1 was "EDGE OF THE SEAT" thriller..
True. Isn't it better for mohanlal if the Director didn't talk to police about it. He could have just published the novel. whats the need to try to make a movie.
Well I feel if he published the novel..it is like letting the cat out of the bag..when things can be dying down,why make it obvious to the public that he killed someone? especially if everyone reads it..doubts will arise in full fury! He was just guessing he might be hunted or things will die on it's own..public might forget after sometime.such a painful gamble.So he waited and he just used it at the right opportunity for his defense.Just an assumption.
In all honesty..felt like I saw a Quality movie like DHRISHYAM after a long time.. Such a relief after seeing MASTER!
The book is already published. His lawyer shows the book and mentions that the IG forced a confession from mohanlal copying the book.