Fusion and Fission in Families and E=mc2...

Nice one, and yes people will will hunt you down.....IF you do not write again

 

Madam,
In Psicks and Che mystery text books there are about 7 differences given between nuclear fusion and fission and you have intelligently taken full advantage of the textual differences to prove your theory.A nice argument for argument sake.
In joint family system there were so many members forming a single unit , having its own positive and negative factors. Due to developmental activities and city formation
and educational devt fission became a necessity and the family has become a nuclear one.
Now there is no need for fusion at all,unless there is difference between the partners.
Though it is a fact that a small energy in the form of minor understanding is sufficient to separate them, it is a fact that high positive energy from various sources like advice from counsellors and elders will of no help to create a fusion, if at all it can be termed so.


I am reminded of Tamil saying" uzhakkile kizhakku, merku paarppathu koodaathu."
( It is already as small as a cup. Which is east and which is west in the cup)
It is hilarious to read but not a real comparison in practical sense.

In practical life we need to create frictions and fissions in order to analyse any problem to come to a positive conclusion.
Life is not about husband, wife, children alone.there are other factors like education, development, justice administration and so on-where we should have a fission like threadbare analysis to come to logical and legal conclusions.
A major problem can be split into various simple problems and can be solved very easily by fission method using lesser energy.
The short comings of atomic fusion and atomic fission is a well analysed topic and thousands of essays/articles have been on rounds in the print/visual media.Arguments are still on.
But in practical life, each problem is different it may need fusion or fission techniques ,case to case basis-not a standardised format-to get solved as seen from historical, economical, administrative and financial events that have occurred globally.

Regret to differ.

Jayasala 42

 

Dear GG,
It took me a while to understand. First I thought it is some mathematical formula and Physics related I skipped it! Then after reading some FBs I became curious and read.

I cannot understand the standard E=mc2 in Physics ( I am poor in Physics) but I can understand your blog. Explained like in a science class the philosophy of life! Yes, fusion is always better than fission or atleast that should be the direction (though it takes some effort).
Syamala

 

Dear ggg
Haha I can imagine einstein rearing his n yr hair for giving a family twist to his formula. Great one gg.

 

GG fusion occurs naturally where as a fission can be created artificially but the end product is highly reactive radioactive particles , there is no self occurrence

 

Oh boy! GG.....a lesson in physics that I had ditched so so so long ago. I tell you I had to brace myself to get a lesson in physics even as I understand E=mc2, even if superficially. Now I see why you are bracing yourself for the slaughter from the trigger of blazing guns. I have to assure you, it is not because of the parallels you have drawn, but most certainly because of the physics lesson you have given us. But you have to understand this too while I agree with you that the m=the mass or intentions to solve issues (as you put it) is very important, I did come away reviewing the fission and fusion concepts way better!