A true-life story of Major Mukund Varadarajan, a commissioned officer in the Indian Army`s Rajput Regiment, who was posthumously awarded the Ashok Chakra for his valor during a counterterrorism operation while on deputation to the 44th Rashtriya Rifles battalion in Jammu and Kashmir. While the Movie excelled in potraying Mukundan's patriotism. It obscured his Brahmin background. The movie shows the secondary character, his wife Indu Varghese as a devout Christian why then obscure the background of the primary character Major Mukundan? Because he is a brahmin. How can a Brahmin be shown goid and laying his life by the Leftist And Dravidian Tamil film Industry? Sharing the post from one of the Major's cousins: Brilliantly bares the lying and blacking out of identities, especially of Tamil Brahmins by Dravidian Movement. How dare a Brahmin be heroic instead of weak and cowardly as we portray in tamil movies and Brahmin women are to be mocked as easy or sluttish . The film ‘Amaran’ is careful to respectfully highlight the religious identity of Martyr Mukund Varadarajan’s wife, but cunningly fudges his own ( In the film he calls his father Naina , a telugu word for father, implying that he is NOT a tambrahm ) A post by Divya Ajithkumar, cousin of Major Mukund Varadarajan, Ashok Chakra winner Major Mukund Varadarajan, my cousin, a simple middle class Tamil Brahmin boy from Tambaram Chennai, who had a zeal to serve his country. He got what he desired to be posted in hashtag#Kashmir under 44 RR. He was as quickly promoted to Major and took down 2 wanted terrorists before being martyred in 2014 in Shopian. The terrorist who was gunned down, rose from the debris like you see in the movies and opened fire when Mukund had turned his back. He received an Ashok Chakra for his bravery. He is survived by his wife Indhu and his daughter. Which is why I was thrilled to hear that the Tamil movie industry was keen to pick up his life story after a decade. The movie is hashtag#Amaran a major production by veteran Kamal Hassan with an A list starcast. It released over the weekend in theatres to a resounding box office success. It’s going to be released in several languages. I couldn’t be happier for a better way to tell his story. However, it does irk me that the film could have been more honest depicting the real life story like Shershah or Uri. Rather, it has taken the “mass” route. This doesn’t surprise me as movies in all genres and languages, have started adopting identity distortion. Which means you compromise the character, their dialect, faith etc to play to the gallery. Profits > Authenticity. This was a rare opportunity to tell an honest story without identity distortion where you could have portrayed a brave character, who wore his faith, identity and dialect proudly, but the movie chose to underplay this by opting to neutralise his character as a mainstream “Tamil” hero. Similar to Captain Gopinath another Tamil Brahmin, whose character was also compromised in Soorarai Potru. While there is a debate on why this aspect doesn’t matter, fact is the per capita contribution from TN is nowhere close to the North when it comes to hashtag#indianarmy enrolments. Leave alone a decorated Major martyr. Therefore much fewer chances of biopics. Given Brahmins represent an even smaller micro minority at 2%, often mocked, caricatured, ridiculed and persecuted through entertainment, academia and the vitriolic government in TN for vote bank politics, it becomes even more important to celebrare this community. Let’s take some other instances to reinforce this - • If you made a movie about a Sikh but chose not to show him with a turban would that not be sacrilegious? • if you made a movie on the late Ratan Tata ji but chose to present him as a “Gujarati” not a Parsi is that fair? • if the Stephen Hawking biopic chose to portray him as a Christian fundamentalist rather than the atheist he was would that be accepted? • The Pianist is about a Jewish Holocaust survivor. Imagine if they stole the storyline but depicted the pianist as a Nazi supporter? By Divya Ajitkumar -Cousin of Major Mukund Varadarajan
Very nice article. unfortunately. it will not be viewed in a positive manner. lets say tamil nadu as an example , this will be shown as religious manipulation theme. i blame the ncert or education board. i remember for years i studied about the greatness of akbar, aurangzeb. but a few lessons were about the greatness of the system followed before. It was quite advanced where these modern issues ok WOKE were addressed, those groups were respected and had a separate place. We had advanced infrastructure. north india might also have had great social and architectural development ( i do not know), it is never highlighted as the great BHARAT. Takshila a great library, is never mentioned well.
True. I too studied in CBSE. Oh god so much chapters on Akbar and the Mughals. Nalanda and Takshashila were the greatest educational universities that time. So many students from all over the world came to study there. The Manuscripts and educational papers burnt for months.
Post from cousin is nice, but is there any statement from Major Mukund's parents or sister on his caste not being overtly shown in the movie? Major Mukund called his parents Naina and Sweety in real life. That's what they showed in the movie. That's wrong? They should change that to Appa, Amma? Movie shows his wife as a Christian from Kerala, it does not show her caste or denomination (Syrian Christian, Catholic, Saint Thomas ...). Movie shows Major as a Hindu from Tamil Nadu. Equal, no? SP was commissioned by Captain Gopinath himself and he is reported to have said the movie was a decent portrayal of his story allowing for some commercialization. When he didn't have problem with his caste being "neutralized" in the movie, why do others?
Let me try to explain. The movie is a Biopic. So why not show the exact background of Major. ? Tamil film industry is ruled by Red gaint movies. The state is run by DMK who have a known Anti brahmin ideology. DMK is powerful in TN with no proper opposition Mukund's parents may have it in their minds, but they can't openly state it in interviews. It's not that easy when living in TN. Freedom of speech does not exist in India as like USA. The same goes for Gopinath. They have to go with the flow. Also they maybe grateful that these Movies were made and people got to know about them. Movies have a huge reach in common public.
I watched this movie just yesterday, and to me, it felt more like a biopic focused on Major Mukund's wife, Indhu, rather than on Major Mukund himself. While Indhu’s story is closely tied to her brave husband, the narrative gives significant space to her perspective. (she tells the story while travelling to receive the award) That said, I don’t see the importance of going into details like caste when portraying a military figure like Major Mukund. The film mentions that he is Tamil and Hindu, while his wife is a Malayali Christian, which is sufficient for the story. It avoids going into specific caste or religious subgroups, staying neutral for both sides. It did not say which caste Indhu belongs or which sub religious groups she follows (RC or Non RC). For context, I am from the Vellalar caste, Tamil ethnicity, Christian faith, and a Sri Lankan by nationality working in international civil service. Do details like these really matter in a biopic unless they’re directly relevant to the story (as if someone gonna make my biopic - but just telling) I also watched a few interviews with Major Mukund's family, where his father mentioned that Mukund didn’t identify with any caste or community; he saw himself as a true Indian, which is a rare but admirable quality. His family, as shown in the movie and in real life, showed no prejudice, accepting a Malayali Christian daughter-in-law without much hesitation unlike other Brahmin. (In contrast, my own in-laws had a hard time accepting a Christian daughter-in-law.) Considering this, I believe it’s unnecessary to emphasize caste when the person himself didn’t value it. If his family has no issue with the portrayal, why should anyone else be upset? His father even shared that Mukund once said he didn’t need anyone’s approval for his relationship with Indhu (a Malayali Christian) except his parents'. Additionally, actor SK respectfully addressed Major Mukund's father as “Naina,” just as Mukund did, which is uncommon in the Brahmin community and drew criticism after the movie was released. But that, to me, speaks volumes. True bravery comes from within, and it often means challenging a flawed social system. Major Mukund stands as a true hero, and I have immense respect for his parents, who raised a son like him.
Absolutely. Christianity is a religion—a faith. Caste, race, language, ethnicity, and nationality are aspects of one's identity; they are cultural, not religious. Don’t confuse the two. Just because I am Christian doesn’t mean I automatically belong to the descendants of David or have Jewish origins. I am Tamil, with a different lineage from early Christians. Christianity teaches us to treat everyone equally, meaning that everyone—regardless of caste, race, or any identity—is equal before God and should be treated equally by fellow Christians. The same applies to Muslims, and I assume to all religions. For instance, among Muslims, there are Marikkars, Shahibs, Hazaras, Tutsis, Furs, Hutus, and many other groups. Converted Christians and Muslims may retain their cultural or caste identities, as their faith has changed, not necessarily their background. While there is no hierarchy in caste within Christianity or Islam, in practice, not everyone adheres to this ideal.