1. Have an Interesting Snippet to Share : Click Here
    Dismiss Notice

Equilibrium

Discussion in 'Snippets of Life (Non-Fiction)' started by Viswamitra, Oct 6, 2019.

  1. Viswamitra

    Viswamitra Finest Post Winner

    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    24,176
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Gender:
    Male
    Carrying body and soul and embracing the one, can you avoid separation? Can you let your body become as supple as a newborn child’s? In the opening and shutting of heaven’s gate, can you play the feminine part? Can you love your people and govern your domain without self-importance? Giving birth and nourishing; having, yet not possessing; working, yet not taking credit; leading without controlling or dominating. One who heeds this power brings the Tao to this very earth. This is the primal virtue. – Verse 10 of Tao

    You have a right to perform your prescribed duties, but you are not entitled to the fruits of your actions. Never consider yourself to be the cause of the results of your activities, nor be attached to inaction. – Bhagavad Gita – Verse 47 of Chapter 2

    For, owners of their deeds (karma) are the beings, heirs of their deeds; their deeds are the womb from which they sprang; with their deeds they are bound up; their deeds are their refuge. Whatever deeds they do-good or evil-of such they will be the heirs. And wherever the beings spring into existence, there their deeds will ripen; and wherever their deeds ripen, there they will earn the fruits of those deeds, be it in this life, or be it in the next life, or be it in any other future life. - Buddha

    “Yad Bhavam Tad Bhavathi” is the saying in Sanskrit meaning, “As you think, so you become”. Where does a thought originate? It originates from the actions performed by the human beings. Like cycle of birth and death, thoughts when empowered with energy, emotion and feeling give shape to actions and when these actions are performed with ownership become Karma whether they are good or bad. Karma itself means action. All the fruits in the tree are intended to nurture the universe with more trees. Yet, it doesn’t bother the tree whether the fruits are consumed by the human or animal as part of the food chain, as it renounces the fruits one way or another. The trees know that fruits are intended to be separated one way or another.

    The western philosophy suggests that one should focus their attention constantly to the present moment. What is the objective? It gives the human beings the ability to do all their actions skillfully, lovingly and selflessly accepting the outcome as is, without any expectations of the fruits of the actions. Let us inquire what nourishes the buddhi (intellect), manas (mind), hridaya (heart), sthula (body) and atma (spirit), the five important parts that are responsible for human existence. The knowledge strengthens the intellect, courage strengthens the mind from staying quiet when it oscillates between pleasure and pain (without excessive celebration or sadness), love strengthens the heart (true love is unconditional feeling the oneness of all beings), samarpanam (surrender/humility) strengthens the body and set free the body from its aggressiveness and finally the righteousness strengthens atma.

    The human beings possess the ability to discriminate what to receive, how to react and when to respond. Sometimes, the response is so quick without enough time for internal reaction. Other times, the reaction is lifelong when the experience one encountered is painful creating indelible impression in the mind filled with emotions and feelings. One remains in reaction mode always forgetting the inherent bliss that is ready to explode inside oneself.

    Seven qualities are dominant in a person who is called Sthitaprajna and they are a) desire-less attitude, b) situation stability, c) emotional stability, d) complete self-control, e) tranquility, f) established in fullness and g) one with Self. The stage of Sthitaprajna is one with a complete wisdom yet lives in the world but not of the world. One could ask whether it is feasible to reach this stage with so much turbulence in our day to day life and in the world.

    What are the choices? We could bottle the day to day problem to be solved by the intellect which itself is merely a tool to transform the human being and doesn’t have permanent existence. We need to understand despite performing skillful, loving and selfless actions, the outcome is not in our hands. The problems in the world are direct reflection of the collective consciousness of all living beings in the world and it is the effort to change the individual consciousness by each person is the contribution one could make to find the world better place to live. We need to remember the words of wisdom from Tao, “having, yet not possessing; working, yet not taking credit; leading yet not taking credit or controlling”. The land and ocean coexist in this planet side by side without one dominating the other and will continue to do so, if the human beings don’t destroy the planet to change its self-balancing ecosystem. Let us find the equilibrium of life and hold on to it to become blissful.
     
    Amica likes this.
  2. jayasala42

    jayasala42 IL Hall of Fame

    Messages:
    5,367
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Gender:
    Female

    Dear Viswa,What a great article! an analytical valuable comparison between Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Western philosophy.The article is a treasure to be shared with younger generation. Great,Viswa Sir.
    The equilibrium or balance or sama dhrishti kon is very difficult to achieve thought not impossible.

    "“having, yet not possessing; working, yet not taking credit; leading yet not taking credit or controlling”.
    Well said.

    In a practical world of mundane existence,where a clear distinction is made between hard work and smart work,how can the above quote apply in a real life situation.?

    Take the instruction '"have and don't possess."It means a lot in all the professions and jobs including teaching, medicine and child bringing up. The sense of possession leads one to being more responsible ,more caring leading to taking great efforts since the work relates to you. It is your child. It is your house. It is your project. Once you are a leader of a project team, you have to own or possess it to have a thorough over see.
    I know Viswa will have ready made answers to counter what I have said.
    In the same way, if you extract work and don't give credit, the quality will suffer.
    In my humble view, these quotes and philosophies are academically interesting and may not lead to success-that is normal success as defined by people at large and not the success as defined by philosophers.
    jayasala 42
     
    Thyagarajan, Viswamitra and Amulet like this.
  3. Amulet

    Amulet IL Hall of Fame

    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    5,088
    Trophy Points:
    408
    Gender:
    Female
    :kissingheart: Nice one Jaya. Your prod (mention of the child) made me remember the story of the one who doesn't acknowledge paternity.

    The word baby is used in America to refer to pretty much all possessions of grand value. "It's my baby" -- is a reference not only to one's possession, it is a declaration as to how one shall take care of it.


    [​IMG]

    In the light of the story of the image above... the translation below can be seen in a new light:

    "You have a right to perform your prescribed duties, but you are not entitled to the fruits of your actions. Never consider yourself to be the cause of the results of your activities, nor be attached to inaction. – Bhagavad Gita – Verse 47 of Chapter 2"
    :roflmao:

    :clap2:
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2019
    Vaikuntha, Thyagarajan and Viswamitra like this.
  4. HariLakhera

    HariLakhera Platinum IL'ite

    Messages:
    2,353
    Likes Received:
    2,727
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    That is the crux of the whole problem. No body was really concerned about this before Industrial revolution in the Nineteenth century. Industrial revolution is the proc]duct of not the increasing population but the the need to meet its ever increasing needs. The question then arises, is curtailing the needs the answer or finding a reasonable solution is.
     
    Thyagarajan and Viswamitra like this.
  5. Viswamitra

    Viswamitra Finest Post Winner

    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    24,176
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Gender:
    Male
    Dear Smt. Jayasala:

    Thank you very much for your first response. I need to listen when you raise such great questions about how to apply those teachings to real life. I understand mere knowledge of such teachings are not going to be of any help unless it is applied and practiced in real life. Frankly, I am not sure I have the answer to your question but I will attempt to respond as I believe such discussions are healthy for my own growth and development.

    The scriptures teach us right living mainly for day to day mundane existence. Fabrics of our culture is built on many such right living principles that came from many religions. I agree there are many people who practice right living even without practicing any religion. They practice the religion of love and right living out of their own consciousness. Religion is essential only for those who are sinking in Samsara Sakara and need support to keep afloat.

    As long as we remain dispensable, which in my view is true in all situations, the world will continue to exist even without us. The child will be raised by someone else, property will be owned by someone later and the project will be managed by someone else as well. The assignment as a mother or as a property owner or a project manager is only for a specific period of time to complete our responsibilities to our great sense of fulfillment and not to claim ownership or possession. If we don't practice "have, but not possess" principle, soon the situation will possess us. A person who becomes the CM or PM, unless he or she understands that he is holding that position with the trust of the people for a period of time, the seat will begin to possess him/her, and he or she will begin doing things to retain his/her position than the purpose why he or she became CM or PM in the first place.

    The scriptures are not suggesting to shrug the responsibilities but only remain unattached to our possessions as nothing gets shipped with us when we leave this mundane world. There is a subtle difference between raising a child with a lot of love Vs feeling the child is mine no matter how old he or she becomes. It is that possessiveness that causes considerable amount of friction later between MIL and DIL as described in many threads in relationships forum.

    In life, we are forced to do many things that are hard not by choice but for coping up with a situation. You are a living example for that based on what you had shared about your life situation. In such a situation, I believe your knowledge, courage, unconditional love, humility and right conduct with some grace, might have helped you overcome the situation with conviction. Many around you would have learned that lesson due to your personal experience.
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2019
    Thyagarajan likes this.
  6. Viswamitra

    Viswamitra Finest Post Winner

    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    24,176
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Gender:
    Male
    Dear Hari Sir,

    It must be a combination of both. We kept expanding our needs while growing in size as well as abused the planet without bothering much about the need to maintain the ecosystem. We never thought it would bite us later when our next generation of people are growing up.
     
    Thyagarajan likes this.
  7. Viswamitra

    Viswamitra Finest Post Winner

    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    24,176
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Gender:
    Male
  8. jayasala42

    jayasala42 IL Hall of Fame

    Messages:
    5,367
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Gender:
    Female
    Dear Viswa,
    I partially agree with your arguments.
    Our children stay with us for nearly 17 to 18 years from infanthood and then leave for University and slowly start their life.18 years in one's longevity is not a short period.It is roughly 25%.Upto 60 years we work , in Govt service or private business.Whether you have or possess, the possession will leave you or you will leave the possession.You do neither have nor possess anything.No doubt, situation starts possessing you, as you have rightly pointed out, which we call destiny .Even if you are not in the habit of acceptance, you are compelled by force of circumstance and you have to manage somehow.

    Your mail seems to suggest that if we cultivate a practice of'having' and 'not possessing' that will pave a way for easy acceptance.

    My question is when we are going to somehow accept, by practice or by force, what is the necessity of having a 'having' feeling that may lead to irresponsibility and care free attitude?

    We may very well have and have a sense of possession, take care in every possible way of our possessions-parents, life partners,children,business and properties .
    Won't that sense of possession give them a maturity of thought that their life will be transcient and some one will take care after their life time?

    Though it is true that sense of possession leads to MIL DIl conflict, the trend is slowly but definitely disappearing in middle class families since the opportunity of DIL-MIL staying together itself is rare.

    One of the 16 samskaras is vivaha-that is initiation into Gruhasthashrma seems to induce a sense of possession and make the man/ woman bear the responsibility together as evidenced by a ritual in Hindu weddings.

    As the bride with her wedding saree comes to ceremony hall,a grass ring is placed on her head, over which the yoke of a plough is placed and a belt made of reed grass is placed around her waist. Water is poured over the yoke. This ritual is symbolic reminder of the fact that the bride and the groom together have to overcome the challenges of life.

    Even after reading your reply I feel that only a sense of possession as evidenced by the ceremony will make a more meaningful life for the benefit of society at large.

    Possession can make you worried and anxious and at the same time make you more responsible and wise to deal with any situation-that In my view, may not be possible if you just have a 'have' feeling.
    The difference is that of being a parent or a guardian.
    jayasala 42
     
    Thyagarajan likes this.
  9. Viswamitra

    Viswamitra Finest Post Winner

    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    24,176
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Gender:
    Male
    Dear Smt. Jayasala:

    I respect your view. By no means, I was disregarding the value a mother adds to the life of a child when I responded above. To a large extend, that period of life determines how the life shapes up for the child in future. My point is, irrespective of all the ceremonies and symbolic meaning of such ceremonies, spouse and children can never be objects of possession. Thank you for the second message with details and also for sharing the significance of wedding ceremonies.
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2019
    Thyagarajan likes this.
  10. jayasala42

    jayasala42 IL Hall of Fame

    Messages:
    5,367
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Gender:
    Female
    Thank you Viswa.
    jayasala42
     
    Thyagarajan likes this.

Share This Page